Tolkienist = an individual who studies, and is a fan of the works of J.R.R Tolkien
Ringer = an ardent reader of The Lord of the Rings – but more specifically, a fan of the films
A few days ago, I came across a post on an online forum with reference to my blog. The user kindly linked A Tolkienist’s Perspective to the post, under the heading “… very interesting Tolkien blogs”.
However, the user also went on to say about the blog:
“I think it’s a bit of a stretch to call yourself a tolkienist when you are so enthusiastic about the films”.
I have nothing against this individual whatsoever – and am thankful he or she posted the link to this blog. I also think there’s nothing wrong with what was written.
However, what confuses me is: why does someone have to be either a “tolkienist” or a “fan of the films”? Why can’t they be both?
I admit that it is thanks to Peter Jackson’s adaptation of The Lord of the Rings that I am here, right now, writing this post.
Without seeing The Fellowship of the Ring back in 2001, I would never have picked up a book (let alone a set of Tolkien books filled with thousands of pages of material, strange names and unimaginably-complex storylines).
It is perfectly possible to be able to separate the books from their adaptations. I’m both a film fan in general and an ardent reader.
James has been an avid fan of Middle-earth after witnessing its cinematic creation in The Fellowship of the Ring, back in 2001. He currently runs the blog ‘A Tolkienist’s Perspective’: delving into the intricacies of Middle-earth and trying to understand Tolkien’s intentions, aspirations and influences. At the same time, he also posts about the author’s more academic works and aspires to write his own recognised contribution in the field of Tolkien studies.